°æ¹®»ç
¿À´Ã ³»°¡ º» »óÇ°
(1)
´Ý±â
È¸»ç¼Ò°³
È¸»ç¼Ò°³
ÀÎ»ç¸»
¿¬Çõ
¾ð·Ð¼ÓÀÇ °æ¹®»ç
Á¶Á÷µµ ¹× ¿¬¶ôÃ³
Ã£¾Æ¿À½Ã´Â±æ
¿Ã´ñ¸Å½º
¼öÇÐÀÚ
¼öÇÐ»ç
¼öÇÐ»ç¶û
´ëÇÐ¼öÇÐÈ¸
´ëÇÑ¼öÇÐ±³À°ÇÐÈ¸
ÀÚ·á½Ç
ÀÚ·á¸ðÀ½
Á¤¿ÀÇ¥
¸ñ·Ï
µ¿¿µ»ó
°ßº»½ÅÃ»
ÀÌº¥Æ®
¼îÇÎ¸ô
¼îÇÎ¸ô >
¼öÀÔµµ¼
>
±¹³»µµ¼
¼öÀÔµµ¼
Mathematics
>
Mathematics
Mathematics Education
Engineering
Language / Linguistics
English Teaching / Methodology
Literature
ELT
Statistics
Calculus
Algebra
Geometry
Topology
Analysis
Differential Equation
History of Mathematics
Statistics
Applied Mathematics
General Science
Introduction to Mathematical Statistics - International Edition(6th,2005)
¹«·á¹è¼Û
ÁöÀºÀÌ
:
Hogg/McKean/Craig
ÃâÆÇ»ç
:
Prentice Hall
ÆÇ¼ö
:
sixth edition
ÆäÀÌÁö¼ö
:
704
ISBN
:
0130085073
¿¹»óÃâ°íÀÏ
:
ÀÔ±ÝÈ®ÀÎÈÄ 2ÀÏ ÀÌ³»
ÁÖ¹®¼ö·®
:
°³
µµ¼°¡°Ý
:
130,000¿ø
( ¹«·á¹è¼Û )
Àû¸³±Ý
:
3,900 Point
This classic book retains its outstanding ongoing features and continues to provide readers with excellent background material necessary for a successful understanding of mathematical statistics.
Chapter topics cover classical statistical inference procedures in estimation and testing, and an in-depth treatment of sufficiency and testing theory—including uniformly most powerful tests and likelihood ratios. Many illustrative examples and exercises enhance the presentation of material throughout the book.
For a more complete understanding of mathematical statistics.
1.probability and distributions
2.multivariate distributions
3.some special distributions
4.unbiasedness , consistency, and limiting distributions
5.some elementary statistical inferences
6.maximum likelihood methods
7.sufficiency
8.optimal tests of hypotheses
9.inferences about normal models
10.nonparametric statistics
11.bayesian statistics
12.linear models
"Hogg and Craig is one of my favorite texts. It is an intermediate text in mathematical statistics similar to Mood, Graybill and Boes. I took qualifying exams in mathematics for my Masters Degree at the University of Maryland in the early 1970s. One of the exams I took was in statistics. I had little formal training in statistics at the time. Hogg and Craig was the recommended text for the statistics exam. So I bought it and studied out of it on my own. It was very clear with excellent coverage of methods for deriving distributions for random variables and transformations of random variables. I passed my exams and got my highest grades on the statistics exam even though I had more training in abstract algebra. Hogg and Craig really helped. It has been revised since then to maintain currency with statistical developments but it still has maintained its clarity and usefulness. Most of the other reviews that are critical of it are way off base. I am sure that efforts have been made with the numerous revisions to keep the material up to date. Perhaps some critics are correct that it comes up short on some modern advances in Bayesian statistics and other computer-intensive statistical methods. But that should not tarnish its reputation as a classic text in mathematical statistics."
"There muliple starting points that could generate your interest and need for this book. If you are a math undergrad major, and this is your required reading, stop here, go get it, use it and probably sell second hand -- you won't be doing that much statistics anyway. If you are a grad student with a major other than statistics, and this is a required reading for a class in statisitical inference you are taking at a local Stat department, stop here and go get it anyway; it won't hurt to have it. Everybody else, welcome to continue...
I am now teaching a semester class on introduction to probability theory (the first class in two semester sequence) using this book, and I don't like it very much. It has a little bit strange audience in mind: students who barely have enough math background to do statistics, just the standard 3 semester calculus sequence, but no real analysis and no complex analysis. If you do statistics for living, or consider doing that, you need something more serious measure-theory based (at least that's how I was taught in my grad program, and I see huge advantages in looking down at probability theory from the measure theory prospective).
In other words, it is one of the few books that fill in the gap between all those colorful but very limited and boring "Probability and Statistics for Housewives" the-only-math-class-for-my-general-college-requirement books that steer away from calculus and call a cdf "area under the curve", on one side; and Cramer's
Mathematical Methods of Statistics
or Kendall/Stuart's
Kendall's Advanced Theory of Statistics
or Billingsley's
Probability and Measure, 3rd Edition
(which I also reviewed), on the other side of the rigor spectrum. You get what you paid for: if you invested more into your math training, you would get a much better leverage and understanding of statistics from other books, see below. With this much of calculus, H&C is probably as far as you can go about math statistics.
The material is sequenced in a somewhat awkward manner. Sigma-fields are mentioned in the first chapter, but are not actually used anywhere -- you need measure extension theorems for this stuff to make sense and be useful, and this will shoot you quite far out of the calculus-only class. So, is this an extra stuff that a stat student does not need? Probably not at this level!
Most examples in ealry chapters use well known distributions like uniform, exponential, Poisson, binomial without naming them, and without using the normal distribution that only appears later in the book. I found this confusing, and so will my students, I am afraid. Many of the important concepts, like modes and percentiles of a distribution, or a nice E[u(X)|X]=u(X) shortcut, are hidden in the exercises, so unless you as the instructor stumble across them in the end of a section, or if you are using this book as a reference, then you and/or your students won't see them.
So overall: yes, it is a dated book, it still is an important book for math stat training; but I will only recommend it for somebody in exactly that calculus-only niche. You can use Cramer as a reference; using Hogg and Craig for a reference won't suffice.
Now, what about the alternatives? I am using Wasserman's
All of Statistics
as a strong supplement in teaching from Hogg and Craig and pulling somewhat nicer examples, exercises, and supplementary results not mentioned in H&C. It also has the same not-so-advanced audience in mind (the course was originally written for computer science students interested in data mining, and a nice extra feature is that Wasserman talks about the computer learning paradigm in parallel to statistical inference paradigm); it is much better written and laid out, with important definitions and theorems clearly highlighted; it structures the material better... BUT! it does not have almost any proofs. However scared you as a student might be of this p-word, your class on mathematical statistics must have enough of those to give you an idea how mathematical statistics works, and how different results in statistics are linked to one another.
Of course another alternative is the classic Cramer "Mathematical Methods of Statistics" textbook that is even more aged (1943) that Hogg and Craig (1958), but it is just better written and more complete. With this one, however, you would need your real analysis, measure theory and complex analysis... or at least some basic understanding of those."
Introduction to Partial Di...
-Zachmanoglou-
(Dover)
Real Analysis Modern Techn...
-Folland-
(Wiley)
A First Course in Abstract...
-John B. Fraleigh-
(Addison-Wesley)
ÇÃ¸³·¯´×À» À§ÇÑ ´ë¼öÇÐ...
°¥·ç¾Æ Áõ¸í
¼º±Õ°ü´ëÇÐ±³ access co...
Applied Statistics...
Introductory Stati...
Applied Statistics...
Elementary Statist...
Introduction to Ma...